Pick a Side, Then Orchestrate: The New Law of Value in Tech Consulting

You're in a sleek conference room, watching yet another tech consulting pitch:

• "We'll make it faster AND safer!"
• "You'll get enterprise security AND startup speed!"
• "Your cloud costs will drop AND performance will improve!"

I know it, you know it - these are fairy tales. Echoes from of an era when tech consulting could promise everything to everyone. That era died sometime between the first major AI hallucination and the latest seven-figure regulatory fine.

The rise of AI, costly regulations, and increasingly complex technical deployments have changed the game. Value creation in modern tech consulting is about having the courage to choose what NOT to deliver. Failed tech projects no longer just waste money - they end careers and cripple companies.

‍

The Five Dimensions of Consulting Value

A few years ago, Source Global Research did something fascinating: they went straight to the buyers of consulting services and asked them a simple question - "Why do you actually hire consultants?" Not what consultants promise, not what shows up in pitch decks, but what makes clients pull out their checkbooks.

The answers clustered around five distinct dimensions of value:

• Better: “Consultants help us produce better project outcomes than we could achieve ourselves.” This isn't about marginal improvements. Clients want transformative upgrades in accuracy, robustness, and credibility. Think GPT-4 vs GPT-3.5, not version 2.1 vs 2.0.
• Easier: “Consultants simplify the project delivery process and make it easier for us to make decisions.” They want consultants that not only solve problems,  but make the solution feel effortless. It's the difference between handing someone a 200-page technical manual and giving them a one-page playbook that actually works.
• Cheaper: “Using consultants is less expensive than completing projects with internal resources or using other types of service providers.” When clients say "cheaper," they don't mean discount rates. They mean better ROI than building in-house or finding alternative solutions. As one CTO told me recently: "I don't care if your day rate is higher - if you can save me from hiring three full-time people, you're cheaper."
• Faster: “Consultants help us achieve results faster than we could ourselves.” It's about collapsing timelines through experience. When a client says they need it faster, what they're really saying is: "We can't afford to learn these lessons the hard way."
• Safer: “Using consultants minimizes the risks associated with the project.” In today's regulatory environment, this dimension has teeth. It’s bulletproof compliance, real resilience. One failed AI deployment or data leak can torpedo careers.

You don't need to excel at all five. In fact, trying to be everything to everyone is a recipe for mediocrity. But you do need to dominate at least one dimension, and be competent in another. That's your differentiation strategy.

Say you want to own the "safer" dimension in AI consulting. You could:

• Put real skin in the game with outcome-based pricing and meaningful guarantees.
• Create detailed deployment playbooks that make auditors smile.
• Build compliance checking into every phase of your methodology.

All of these initiatives will convince clients of your value add. The nuance for tech consulting is that these five dimensions fight each other. They create tensions that force hard choices.

These five dimensions have always mattered in consulting. But in tech consulting, they've become particularly critical - and particularly impossible to deliver simultaneously. Why? Because modern technical systems have reached a level of complexity where optimizing for one dimension actively degrades another. When a bank's AI system needs to make real-time decisions about fraud, "faster" and "safer" become direct opponents. When a retailer's cloud infrastructure needs to scale for Black Friday, "cheaper" and "better" start an expensive fight.

That’s the daily reality of modern tech consulting.

‍

Why Tech Consulting Amplifies the Challenge

Remember when a tech project just needed to work? Those were simpler times.

I watched a cloud migration implode last month - luckily, from the sidelines. A colleague shared the painful details. Everything looked perfect on paper: meticulous planning, top-tier tools, experienced team. The works. Then reality hit - a forgotten legacy system here, an undocumented dependency there, and suddenly the whole house of cards came tumbling down. Cost: $2.3 million. Time lost: 8 months. Careers damaged: at least three.

This isn't an isolated incident. It's the new normal. Technical delivery has become a high-wire act without a safety net. Pilots turn into endless proof-of-concept purgatory. Even "simple" cloud deployments feel like defusing bombs - one wrong move and boom.

While the complexity of delivery has skyrocketed, the market has become a cacophony of identical promises. Open any tech consulting firm's website. I'll wait. I bet you can find the same buzzword bingo:

• "Digital transformation experts!"
• "Cloud security ninjas!"
• "Data analytics wizards!"

It's noise. All noise. And clients know it. They've been burned too many times by firms long on promises and short on delivery. When a Chief Digital Officer stakes their reputation on an AI deployment, they're risking both the organization's budget AND their career.

This is exactly why those five dimensions matter more than ever. In a world where every project carries huge personal risk, you can't be everything to everyone. You need to plant your flag. Pick your trade-offs. Tell clients exactly what you'll sacrifice to deliver what matters most.

‍

When Dimensions Collide: The Strategic Trade-Offs

Imagine those two digital transformation pitches. Same retailer, same problem: they needed to modernize their entire e-commerce stack before Black Friday.

Firm A rolled in with the usual promises: "We'll deliver a world-class platform in 6 months without disrupting your current operations."

Firm B took a different approach. Their lead partner leaned forward and said: "Look, we can do this fast or we can do this right. If you want it before Black Friday, we'll have to cut corners on the architecture. If you want it built to last, we're looking at Q1 next year. Your choice."

Guess who wins? My bet is Firm B, 95% of the time. Because after three failed digital transformations, the client was ready for some honest trade-offs.

This is the reality of modern tech consulting: these five dimensions don't play nice together. They create unavoidable tensions that force hard choices. Here's what these collisions look like in the real world:

• Better vs. faster: Digital transformations often face this trade-off. You can rush deployment creating technical debt (faster) or delay for proper architecture (better). There's no third option. That's why successful firms plant their flag: either "We're your fast-track partner" or "We're your quality-first shop." You can’t credibly own both.
• Safer vs. better: We can see this tension clear in cybersecurity consulting. One fintech I’m familiar with had to choose: either Fort Knox-level controls that frustrated users, or business-friendly security with managed risks. Cyber boutiques win by explicitly picking a lane: "bulletproof compliance" or "business-aware security." Both are viable, but not simultaneously.
• Cheaper vs. safer: Cloud optimization creates this collision. Cutting spend aggressively saves money but can weaken redundancy. You can have the cheapest cloud infrastructure or the safest. Not both. Smart consultancies align with either the cost-cutting CFO or the sleep-at-night CTO. Promising both is a credibility killer.
• Easier vs. faster: Every AI project faces this tension. Rapid deployment (faster) leads to chaos later, while proper guardrails (easier long-term) slow the initial rollout. AI firms can choose: Either "We're your rapid-pilot partner" or "We're your scale-without-chaos shop."
• Better vs. cheaper: ESG consulting makes this trade-off crystal clear. Clients might dream of someone delivering SEC-grade emissions reporting at startup prices - but it doesn't exist. Quality sustainability work requires serious investment. If you’re a boutique that wants to be taken seriously in this space, you need to decide whether you’ll own “compliance-grade credibility” or “lean sustainability”.

The fastest-growing boutiques in tech consulting don't deny these tensions. In fact, they're brave enough to embrace them. They pick their trade-offs and own them. In a world of impossible promises, brutal honesty is refreshing.

‍

Industry-Specific Value Priorities

Let me share something I've noticed after a decade of watching tech consultancies rise and fall: every sector has its own gravitational pull. It's fascinating to watch how market leaders pivot their value propositions as regulations and technology evolve.

Take Palantir's journey in AI consulting. Five years ago, their pitch was pure Silicon Valley: "Move fast, deploy everywhere, figure out the details later." But watch their messaging now - it's all about responsible AI and regulatory compliance. Why? Because one spectacular AI failure can trigger congressional hearings.

Or look at what's happening in cloud infrastructure. Remember when everyone was racing to offer the cheapest, fastest AWS migration? Those days are gone. Talk to any CTO managing five different clouds, and they'll tell you what matters now: making this mess manageable. That's (one of the reasons) why Snowflake has become huge and continues growing ridiculously fast - they turned easier into their superpower. They're not the cheapest or the fastest, but they make multi-cloud feel like single-cloud.

The pattern repeats across every sector:

• Cybersecurity: In 2020, "We'll lock down everything!" In 2023, "We'll make security simple." Why? Because companies are drowning in security tools. CrowdStrike won big by consolidating 15 different security functions into one platform that actually makes sense.‍
• Data & Analytics: Before GDPR, "We'll give you the best insights!" After GDPR, "We'll give you compliant insights." Just ask Databricks - they had to rebuild their entire lakehouse architecture around governance. Better means nothing if it's not also safer.‍
• Sustainability Tech: Pre-SEC rules, "We'll help you report carbon footprint." Post-SEC rules, "We'll help you survive an audit." Watershed is an example. They went from cool carbon tracking to serious audit-ready platforms because that's what keeps CEOs up at night now.

I know I’ve mentioned multi-billion dollar organizations as examples, but I only did so to illustrate a point that matters to all of us running boutique practices. You don't have to create value the same way the big dogs do. But ignore them at your peril.

If you're an early-stage consultancy thinking about planting your flag on choosing a value dimension while ignoring how clients typically buy the services in your category, you're playing a dangerous game.

The fastest-growing boutiques aren't the firms that blindly follow sector trends or ignore them completely. They're the ones that understand the currents but chart their own course through them. They pick their dimensions carefully, like an architect designing for both today's needs and tomorrow's possibilities.

‍

A Step-by-Step Process to Rethink Your Value Drivers

Last month, I sat down with the founder of a cloud security boutique who was struggling to differentiate his firm. "Everyone says they're faster, better, AND safer," he told me. "How do I even compete?"

My answer surprised him: "Stop competing on all three."

Most consultancies use these five dimensions like items on a checklist: sprinkle them through discovery calls, add them to proposal slides, tack them onto status reports. But that's missing their real power. These dimensions aren't tactical tools - they're a strategic decision that should inform everything from your service design to your pricing model.

Let me show you how to weaponize these dimensions, using real examples from firms I know and/or worked with who nailed the transition. Here's the process I've seen work repeatedly:

1. Choose (and actually own) your signature dimensions;
2. Design offerings that prove those dimensions;
3. Communicate with proof, not promises;
4. Align your pricing with your value claims.

It's not a complicated sequence. But things get really interesting when you try to execute it.

‍

Choose (And Own) Your Signature Dimensions

Here's the thing about these five dimensions - trying to win at all of them is like trying to be the fastest, strongest, AND most flexible athlete in the Olympics. It doesn't happen. Not even McKinsey pulls that off, and they have infinite resources.

Instead of playing fantasy consulting, start with what you can prove. Let me share three real stories (with names changed) that show how this works:

• A boutique cybersecurity firm found traction by combining continuous testing (safer) with a simplified dashboard that non-technical executives can understand (easier). They doubled down on those dimensions because they’re experts in reducing response time for security incidents.
• An AI transformation consultancy 5x their revenue in the last 12 months without increasing client capacity. They focus on high-quality AI training data (better) with rapid iteration cycles (faster), and explicitly tell clients they're not the cheapest option. What they’re most proud about is their short time to value for AI deployments.
• A sustainability advisory firm in the carbon accounting space decided to focus on combining audit-grade tracking (safer) with science-backed methodology (better). They charge premium prices and grow through referrals because they've stopped trying to also be the fastest or cheapest option. A number they always bring up during client conversations is their high audit pass rates for sustainability reporting.

See the pattern? Each firm started with something they could measure and brag about, not what they wished they could do. They picked their lane based on actual results, not market predictions or gut feelings.

Yes, you can make aspirational choices - but they better be grounded in some reality. Nothing kills credibility faster than claiming dimensions you can't prove.

‍

Design Offerings That Prove Your Dimensions

I recently reviewed a tech consultancy's service catalog. Their flagship offering? "Digital Transformation Solutions." I could practically hear prospective clients yawning.

Let's get specific about how to design services that actually prove your value dimensions. What I've seen work in the real world is focusing on three things: Naming services around measurable outcomes, building proof points, and creating dimension-specific IP.

First, replace vague offerings with specific promises:

• "6-Week Cloud Cost Optimization" (cheaper + faster)
• "Zero-Trust Security Implementation with 30-Day Time to Value" (safer + easier)
• "AI Governance Framework with 99% Model Accuracy Guarantee" (better + safer)

Second, each service should have built-in metrics that prove your dimensional focus. Pick whatever KPIs make sense to the problem you’re solving. A cloud security firm I advise embeds evidence directly into their delivery process:

• Weekly security score improvements
• Time-to-remediation tracking
• Executive dashboards showing progress
• Compliance status updates

Third, develop tools and frameworks that reinforce your chosen dimensions. This can be assessment frameworks. Implementation playbooks. Monitoring dashboards. ROI calculators.

Here's how one cloud optimization boutique (cheaper + faster) uses proprietary IP to deliver more value to clients:

• Day 1: Clients get access to their proprietary cost modeling tool.
• Week 1: Automated scripts start finding savings.
• Month 1: Real-time dashboard shows accumulating cost reductions.
• Quarter 1: Comprehensive savings report with all the receipts.

Every deliverable, every tool, every meeting reinforces their chosen dimensions. There's no room for doubt about what they're excellent at.

The key is to stop treating deliverables as just "stuff to send clients." Turn them into evidence of your value dimensions in action. And make value visible and measurable whenever it’s possible.

‍

Communicate With Proof, Not Promises

Generic claims about being a "digital transformation partner" or "trusted advisor” don't work anymore. Modern tech buyers are immune to consulting buzzwords. They've been burned too many times by firms that were long on promises and short on delivery.

But there's good news - if you actually have proof, you can cut through the noise. You can provide proof both in your positioning message, in your content, and through your prospect interactions.

When crafting your value propositions, it’s a good idea to lead with results (rather than capabilities) and back claims with specific, supporting evidence. Instead of:

• "We do AI transformation"
• "We handle cloud security"
• "We help with sustainability"

Say:

• "We've deployed AI in 50+ banks with zero compliance incidents" (safer + better)
• "Our clients reduce cloud costs by 40% in 90 days or less" (cheaper + faster)
• "100% of our sustainability reports pass SEC scrutiny" (safer + better)

Your content should also demonstrate your dimensional focus. Remember that the first goal of your posts, articles, and talks is to be useful for readers, not sound smart. This also applies for sales enablement assets and collateral.

Here's how one cybersecurity boutique does it:

• Case studies showing exact incident response times;
• Monthly benchmark reports comparing their results to industry standards;
• Client testimonials specifically about their speed and accuracy';
• Technical deep-dives that demonstrate expertise while being actually useful.

Finally, you can do the same whenever you interact with prospects on a 1:1 basis. Remember the mantra: “Show, don’t tell.” In professional services, the sale is the sample.

Your posture, communication style, and personality matter. But the best way to provide real evidence of how you work - and what it would look like to work together - is through pilot offerings:

• “Safe AI Use-Case Discovery Workshop”: Identifying 3–5 high-ROI but low-compliance-risk AI opportunities tailored to the prospect’s processes, with a prioritized quick-win roadmap.
• “Cloud Cost Leak Assessment”: A 10-day analysis of billing + architecture to identify the “top 10 cost leak sources” with quantified savings opportunities.
• “Sustainability Disclosure Health Check”: Review the last annual report/filing against SEC climate disclosure rules, flagging any gaps or risks.

Each interaction becomes a micro-proof of your value dimensions. You're not just telling them you're faster or safer - you're demonstrating it.

‍

Align Your Pricing with Your Value Claims

"If you're so confident about the results, why don't you put your fees at risk?"

That question, from a skeptical CFO to a cloud optimization firm, changed how they priced forever. Today, they take 25% of verified savings - and they're growing faster than ever.

Here's the thing about pricing: It's your chance to prove you actually believe in your value dimensions. Let me share real pricing models I've seen work:

• Faster: Base fee + speed premium (20% extra for 30-day vs. 90-day implementation) or milestone acceleration bonuses (10% bonus for each month ahead of schedule). I’ve heard from the co-founder of an AI deployment firm that he charges 2x for 6-week vs. 12-week implementations.
• Safer: Fixed fee + compliance bonus (tied to audit pass rates), risk-sharing models (fees tied to security incident reduction), guarantee-backed pricing (full refund if security standards aren't met). Example: A cyber firm that worked with us ties 30% of fees to maintaining specific security ratings.
• Easier: Subscription models with dedicated support, fixed-price "complexity reduction" packages, success fees tied to reduced maintenance hours. While it’s still not the rule, I know a couple of digital transformation boutiques who price based on reduction in client team hours.
• Cheaper: Savings-share models (% of documented cost reduction), ROI-guaranteed fixed fees, performance-based pricing with cost targets. A cloud optimization firm takes 25% of first-year savings, for example.
• Better: Quality-linked fees (tied to accuracy/performance metrics), outcome-based pricing with clear quality benchmarks, IP licensing models for proprietary frameworks. These are all savings-share models, but always framed with guardrails.

Pricing is a powerful way to prove your positioning isn’t just words. But the key is alignment: Your pricing structure should make it financially advantageous for you to deliver on your chosen dimensions.

‍

From Trade-offs to Transformation: The Rise of the Orchestrator

Remember those promises from the opening?

• "We'll make it faster AND safer!"
• "You'll get enterprise security AND startup speed!"
• "Your cloud costs will drop AND performance will improve!"

We now understand why these are dangerous lies. They're remnants of an era when technical systems were simple enough that you could sometimes deliver (a bit of) everything to everyone. That era is over.

A CTO recently shared a story that proved my point. During a vendor pitch for their cloud transformation, he'd listened patiently to what seemed like a flawless presentation. When the consultancy claimed they'd "make it better AND faster AND safer," he immediately checked out - of course, he was skeptical.

But it was his follow-up comment that captured the real shift happening in our industry: "We don't need another vendor promising the moon. We need someone who can work across different platforms, and make all our vendors work together."

This conversation crystalized something I've been watching unfold across the tech consulting space. Three forces are reshaping our industry: AI is eating our lunch, regulations are multiplying like rabbits, and clients have gotten remarkably sophisticated. To survive, consultants need to become orchestrators.

Take what's happening with AI. Last month, I sat in on a boutique firm's quarterly review. Their new AI-powered analysis toolkit had just gone live, turning what used to be two weeks of analyst work into a 15-minute automated process. But their biggest client didn't care about the time saved - they cared about what happened next. "Who ensures the AI's recommendations align with our business reality? Who mediates between our data scientists who want perfect models and our operators who need workable solutions?" That’s the obvious question the founder didn’t see coming.

How clients are behaving in a world of increasing regulation also reinforces my thesis. A cybersecurity boutique I advise recently landed their biggest client yet - not because they had better security tools, but because they'd become masters at orchestrating compliance across complex systems. While their competitors were still selling point solutions for the EU AI Act, they were showing clients how to harmonize regulatory requirements across their entire tech stack, multiple vendors, and competing business priorities. Their pitch wasn't about better compliance - it was about smoother compliance.

Last example: A few weeks ago, I watched two firms pitch for a major cloud transformation project. The first went in with a polished deck about their technical excellence. The second opened with a simple statement: "We're going to show you exactly which trade-offs you'll face, and how we'll help your organization navigate them." Guess who won? The client's feedback couldn't be clearer: "Finally, someone who understands that our real challenge isn't technical - it's organizational."

This is where those five dimensions of value become more than just a framework - they're your orchestration score:

• When clients say better, they mean "How will you coordinate expertise across our platforms and teams to deliver superior results?"
• When they ask for faster, they're really asking "How will you orchestrate multiple workstreams without creating chaos?"
• Safer isn't about more controls - it's about harmonizing compliance across an entire ecosystem.
• Easier means "How will you make this complex change feel manageable for everyone involved?"
• And cheaper? That's about optimizing the whole system, not just squeezing individual parts.

‍

Three Key Questions

So what does this mean for your practice? Start by asking yourself three questions I've found invaluable when advising boutique firms:

First, what's your orchestration story? Not your capabilities list or your service menu - your actual narrative about how you'll conduct this complex symphony of change. The cybersecurity boutique I mentioned earlier doesn't talk about their technical expertise anymore. They tell stories about how they've helped clients navigate the maze of compliance while keeping their business running.

Second, which trade-offs will you own? A cloud optimization firm I work with recently revamped their entire pitch. Instead of promising "faster AND cheaper AND safer," they now lead with: "We'll help you make intentional trade-offs between speed and stability, and we'll show you exactly how we'll manage those trade-offs every step of the way."

Last but not least, how will your orchestration approach stand out? Because here's what I've learned after decades in this industry: In a world where individual excellence is increasingly commoditized, the ability to orchestrate meaningful change is the ultimate differentiator.

The future belongs to the orchestrators. Not the firms promising perfection in every dimension, but those brave enough to say: "We understand exactly which trade-offs matter in your transformation, and we'll align every stakeholder, every platform, and every process to deliver on them."

Are you ready to pick up the conductor's baton?