You Can’t Outwork a Broken Model

Tuesday night in March. Slack finally went quiet. Maya sat at the kitchen table with a half-finished cup of cold coffee and her laptop open.

Two new projects - $65,000 each - had just landed. She beat another well-known consultancy in her space by adding “light implementation” at no extra cost. “A few extra days are worth it, and this will make renewal easier”, she told herself.

It felt like momentum. It looked like growth.

Ninety days later, her dashboard told a stranger story: Revenue up $130,000. Cash down $18,000.

Part of the gap was timing - she tied part of the payment to project wrap up. But most came from margin: work she gave away that cost her both time and money.

“How am I making less money with more work?” For a moment, she thought there was a problem with the formulas in her spreadsheet.

Her week was already maxed out: Around 30 hours in delivery, 10 in BD (which she had to protect like a lion), the rest lost to overhead. Every “win” simply packed more hours into the same denominator - her calendar.

“Oh god. I gave away scope to win. And now it’s winning back my margin.” The realization stung. Maya didn’t have an effort problem. She had a denominator problem.

Growth isn’t about adding more work to the same calendar. It’s about redesigning the denominator - making each founder hour worth more instead of multiplying hours that already cost you.

Most founders try to fix flat growth by hiring or hiking prices. Both can help, but only if the model beneath them holds. Hiring without playbooks kills margin. Raising prices without yield discipline just inflates the same denominator. Flat revenue is progress when it buys you time to fix both.

‍

The Denominator Trap

Every founder-led boutique has an invisible ceiling. Not cash. Not clients. Calendar.

When your time becomes the denominator, every other number - revenue, profit, growth - depends on how those hours are carved.

Here’s the one formula that tells the truth about your business model:

Contribution per Founder Hour (Founder Yield) = (Revenue − True Delivery Costs) ÷ All Founder Hours

It’s simple but ruthless.

• “True delivery costs” means everything it takes to deliver the work: team, subcontractors, tools, and - this is the part most founders skip - your own priced time (at replacement or market founder rate) and any “free” extras you throw in to win a deal.
• “Contribution” is your gross profit after delivery costs, before overhead.
• The denominator, “all founder hours”, includes delivery, BD, management, and the invisible glue work in between. BD time counts even though it doesn’t book immediate revenue because yield is measured over time, not in a single week.

That’s the real yield of your firm - how much contribution (the dollars left after delivery costs) each founder hour actually produces.

If you wouldn’t pay yourself for an hour you spend, you’re subsidizing the client. And when contribution per founder hour falls while revenue rises, the math is telling you something effort can’t fix: you’re sprinting in sand.

‍

When More Revenue Pays Less

Here’s Maya’s math, once. After that, you’ll never need a spreadsheet to feel it.

Before:

• 2 projects × $65,000 = $130,000 revenue
• Delivery costs (staff + tools + founder time) = $56,000
• Gross margin = 57%
• Quarterly contribution = $74,000
• Founder hours ≈ 130
• Contribution per founder hour (Founder Yield) = $74,000 ÷ 130 = $569/hr

After:

To “add value,” Maya said yes to light implementation and extra analytics cycles. Invoices crept up a touch -  $140,000 revenue - but the real cost was time. Her founder hours ballooned from 130 to 190, and gross margins slipped to 50% as oversight and rework piled up.

• New revenue = $140,000
• Delivery costs (staff + tools + founder time) = $70,000
• Gross margin = 50%
• Contribution = $70,000
• Founder hours ≈ 190
• Founder Yield = $70,000 ÷ 190 = $368/hr

Revenue up. Hours up. Founder yield down.

She worked sixty extra hours for $4k less profit.

That’s the denominator trap in plain sight: when founder hours expand faster than contribution, every new “yes” quietly devalues your time - even with higher revenue.

This all makes perfect sense (numbers don’t lie), but it’s quite counter-intuitive. The better Maya sold, the harder growth got.

Here’s the best analogy I’ve heard for the denominator trap: Each extra “yes” is another slice of the same pie. It’s a pie-eating contest where the prize is more pie.

Sometimes the smartest form of growth is to hold revenue steady, patch the leaks, and let yield compound.

‍

The Two Napkin Tests for Sanity and Scale

Maya was working harder and earning less per hour. But what happened to her was completely avoidable. Once you understand the denominator trap, it’s helpful to have a rule of thumb or heuristic you can use to stop the self-deception.

Here are two 60-second checks that can save you months of overwork.

‍

Check 1: The Yield Test

Founder Yield = (Revenue − True Delivery Costs) ÷ All Founder Hours

This is your speedometer. Run it every quarter. If the number rises, your consultancy is compounding. If it falls, don’t add more fuel - find the leak.

Every drop in yield traces back to one of three drivers:

• Margin (too many freebies, weak pricing, bloated scope)
• Client Lifetime Value (one-off projects, no follow-on ladder)
• Bandwidth (founder hours crowding out BD or leadership time)

If yield drops two quarters in a row, you don’t have a sales problem - you have a model problem.

‍

Check 2: The Feasibility Test

Once you know your yield trend, test whether your profit goal even fits inside your calendar.

Target Profit ≤ Deliverable Revenue Capacity × True Gross Margin

To make this clearer:

• Deliverable revenue capacity = the revenue you can realistically deliver this quarter under sustainable limits (founder delivery ≤ 50 %, staff ≤ 80 %).
• True GM = your real gross margin after delivery costs, including your own priced time and any “free” work.

Say you cap founder delivery at 15 hours a week (half of a 30-hour delivery limit). With your team’s current capacity, that’s $250k deliverable revenue at a 50% margin - so your maximum profit potential is $125k this quarter. If your goal is $200k, it’s unattainable.

If the target sits above this line, no amount of hustle can close the gap. It’s mathematically impossible without redesign. You can’t hustle your way to more hours or better margins.

When the goal doesn’t fit, adjust one or more of the same levers - raise margin, extend CLV, or free bandwidth - until it does. Only then does it make sense to look outward.

If you still have room but not enough work to fill it, the bottleneck has finally shifted from capacity to demand. That’s when pipeline math starts to matter. But never before.

‍

Quick check if you don’t time-track

Audit your calendar. Estimate how much time went to delivery, BD, and management in a typical week. Multiply by 13. It’s crude but honest.

Here’s a quick diagnostic:

• Founder delivery: Ideally it should sit around 40-50%. If it’s over 50%, you will likely struggle to perform business development consistently.
• Business development: At least 20% of your working hours. It includes outreach, marketing initiatives, proposals, renewal calls (but not client updates). Below this, the next quarter suffocates. Your network will be neglected, renewals will die, pipeline will dry.
• Staff utilization: If you have a delivery team, aim for 60-80% of their time allocated to delivery. If it’s much lower, you might struggle to justify their salary. Above 80%, rework melts margin.

There’s a lot of nuance here, of course. But the economics and physiological limits trump whatever preferences you may have. Those who ignore the time management challenge here often end up burned out.

‍

Numbers Don’t Lie, But Founders Often Do (To Themselves)

Earlier this year, I’ve met with the three partners of an analytics boutique in the UK. They were growing strong, and aimed to add $400k profit in six months.

I’ve quickly ran the two napkin tests with them. Founder yield was going down, and the economic capacity was under $300k. They sprinted anyway.

Two projects overran scope. One renewal slipped. One partner’s doctor mentioned blood pressure.

We met again a couple months ago and they gave me an update. Revenue rose, but margin fell from 54 % to 47 %. Contribution per founder hour halved.

I took a while, but they finally listened to the math (they do analytics!). The firm stripped “free implementation” (training & configuration, roughly 20–30 hours per project), hired a lead associate, and narrowed scope to advisory.

While it’s still early to see the full impact of all those changes, the first numbers are coming as predicted. Pipeline conversion rates dipped a bit, but founder yield jumped more than 60%. Margins are already rebounding.

Flat revenue, higher yield, calmer calendar. That’s what real growth looks like.

‍

How Maya Plugged the Leaks Without Growing Revenue

Maya’s own napkin tests revealed the same pattern - revenue pumping through a leaky pipe. She patched it in three moves:

1. Price what used to be free. “Light implementation” became a $12k add-on. Three clients still said yes. Each replaced about 50 unpaid hours per project - $8-9k of hidden cost (win-rate impact was minimal; yield per founder hour rose).
2. Narrow scope. Trimmed 60 hours of low-value analysis. Smaller promises, faster delivery, happier clients.
3. Add a follow-on offer. She framed it as a milestone-triggered option: “If we hit target by week 6, we move into enablement at the same rate - valid until next month.” Two clients took it.

Quarter later: Total revenue ≈ $320k. Gross margin ≈ 60 %. Same total hours. Contribution per founder hour ≈ $850 (up from $440).

She didn’t work more. She changed what counted as work. Flat revenue, doubled yield.

‍

The Founder Yield Triangle

Every founder-led boutique lives inside a triangle of three constraints: Margins, client lifetime value, and bandwidth. Together they decide the only number that truly matters - contribution per founder hour.

When one corner stretches too far, yield collapses. Here’s the map.

Each corner represents a failure mode. The center is balance.

In the bandwidth corner we find the “solo hero”: Every win just adds work. Revenue grows, but every project still runs through your calendar. Gross margin looks healthy, yet yield per hour falls. Typical signs are founder delivery > 50 %, BD < 20 %, team idle.

In the margin corner is the “nice-guy consultant”: Clients love you, margins don’t. You discount renewals, throw in “light implementation,” or chase perfection long past scope. Every unpaid hour becomes a quiet tax on your own profit. Typical signs are artificially inflated margins (as founder’s time is not accounted), true gross margins < 50 %, hidden freebies in SOWs.

Finally, if you’re in the CLV corner I’ll call you a “pitch cyclist”: Work comes easy, renewal doesn’t. Each quarter starts at zero because projects don’t lead anywhere. You’re always chasing instead of compounding. Typical signs are very few repeat business and projects with no priced next steps.

“The balanced boutique” is in the center. This is the calm middle where yield compounds quietly. Founder delivery ≈ 45 %, True GM ≥ 60 %, follow-on ladder working. Revenue might stay flat for a while, but profit, energy, and sleep all rise.

‍

Pulling the Right Lever

Whenever your napkin tests show a ceiling, fix it by pulling one lever at a time. Here at the BCC, we have detailed, evidence-based playbooks to help clients put those ideas into practice. But let me give you a few pointers.

To make each client worth more (increase CLV), design your offer ladder as if it were a book, not a blog post. Each engagement should end by opening the next chapter: “What happens after this project?” Add priced next steps to SOWs and track the conversions. That’s how you double CLV without doubling sales calls.

Now, if you want to raise margins (stop paying for “value adds”) you will probably need to overcome fear and some limiting beliefs. Cut freebies. Narrow scope. Productize the 70 % that repeats. Turn your discovery workshop into a standard deck + QA checklist. Document your handover playbook. Everybody knows doing these stuff makes a better business, but we keep avoiding it.

Finally, if the problem is your bandwidth, you need to change the denominator. Delegate with playbooks. Shift your time from execution to orchestration. Kill custom one-offs unless priced at premium. Introduce a continuity retainer to smooth peaks and valleys. It’s wise to aim for founder delivery ≤ 45 % and BD ≥ 20 %. Do this, and your founder yield (and profit) will rise even if revenue stays flat.

If your founder yield is falling, you’re drifting toward a corner of the triangle.

Pull one lever, move back toward the center, and your economics rebalance.

Why not just hire? Because hiring without productized workflows moves bandwidth but melts margin. Productize first, then delegate.

‍

Where to Start: Margin, CLV, or Bandwidth?

Don’t pull all three at once, start where the pain is loudest. Here’s a simple triage:

• Exhausted and overworked? Pull the bandwidth lever. Cap delivery at 50 %, protect 20 % for BD, and rebuild slack before you chase growth.
• Working sensible hours but underpaid? Pull the margin lever. Re-scope, re-price, and remove freebies until true GM starts with a six.
• Profitable but constantly restarting from zero? Pull the CLV lever. Add priced follow-ons, shorten sales cycles, and build continuity.

One caveat: If your founder yield doesn’t rise after any of these moves, the problem isn’t efficiency - it’s positioning. You may be selling to procurement-driven buyers or solving episodic, price-capped problems.

In that case, no amount of optimization will save you. You have to revisit the fundamentals - who you serve, what you solve, and why it’s worth a premium.

Sometimes the bottleneck is not operations, but strategic.

‍

Measure Before You Move

Three months later, Maya ran the numbers again. Revenue was flat. Profit doubled. Her calendar finally had air in it.

That’s what happens when you stop chasing “more” and start designing for yield. Her firm was not bigger, but was definitely smarter. The real unlock was a clearer view of how the firm makes money: what every hour produces, where margin disappears, what’s the limiting factor.

That clarity is what most founders never pause to get. They jump from quarter to quarter, hoping a few more proposals will fix the math. But a poorly designed business won’t grow no matter how much hustle you put in.

You need to understand contribution, margins, and CLV to stop mistaking motion for progress.

If you haven’t done that math in a while - or ever - do it now. Run the two napkin tests. Check your yield per founder hour. Ask whether your next profit target even fits inside your calendar.

Or apply for our free Growth Scan - a 60-minute working session that helps founder-led boutiques see their business the way the numbers already do, and uncover the constraint that’s holding it back. You can check if you’re a fit here.

Growth is what happens when design replaces effort.