The Pilot’s Paradox: Why Simple Consulting Offers Win First

Here's something weird about consulting: the best pilot offering is usually sitting right in front of you, waving its arms. It's not clever or complex - it's that dead-simple solution you've used dozens of times, the one that feels almost too obvious to charge money for.

‍

When Simple Feels Too Simple

Let me tell you about two consultants I worked with recently. First was this tech guy who'd created this fancy digital transformation framework. Spent months on it. But his real money-maker was a simple two-day assessment where he'd look at legacy systems. Every time he did it, it turned into a six-figure deal. When I suggested making this his pilot offering, he looked at me like I'd insulted him. "But that's too basic," he said.

Same story with a data scientist I know. She had this straightforward "Data Quality Audit" that clients loved. It consistently got her foot in the door and had already led to $500,000 in additional work. But she wanted nothing to do with it as a pilot. She was dead set on leading with predictive analytics and AI - you know, the impressive-sounding stuff.

It's fascinating how much resistance there is to these obvious choices. I've watched dozens of deeply experienced consultants dismiss their most natural opportunities because they feel too simple. They're terrified that if they lead with something basic, clients will see them as junior or generic. This fear of looking basic is exactly what makes them miss their best shot at getting started.

The irony is that trying to look sophisticated usually results in overengineered pilots that are harder to sell and deliver. Instead of starting with something focused that actually solves a problem, consultants build these elaborate offerings that try to fix everything at once. They pile on complexity, add extra meetings with stakeholders, create fancy frameworks - all because they want to seem more "strategic." It's like they're scoring own goals in their pursuit of looking smart.

‍

Status Pilots Fail

Look, I get it. Everyone wants to be doing the high-status strategic work. We’ve all dreamt (at least in some point of our career) about walking into C-suite boardrooms and reshaping entire organizations. Nothing wrong with that dream. The problem is that when consultants chase this status from day one, they end up creating pilot offerings that are way too complex for how clients actually start relationships.

What actually works is starting with unsexy, tactical problems that clients need solved right now. Let's look at cloud consulting. You know what the most successful firms do? They don't lead with "digital transformation." They start by helping clients cut their cloud bills. It's mundane, sure, but it works because it gives clients an easy, low-risk way to test if you know what you're talking about while solving a real problem they have.

I've seen this resistance to simplicity play out in the same ways over and over:

• The "Kitchen Sink" pilot: A cloud consultant tried to combine cost optimization, security assessment, and performance tuning into one pilot. It took him three months just to explain it to prospects, and when he finally sold it, he couldn't deliver it cleanly.
• The "Prestige Play": A process improvement consultant insisted on filling her pilot with fancy Six Sigma language. Guess what prospects kept asking about? "That simple workflow thing" she'd mentioned as an aside.
• The "Framework Fetish": An operations consultant spent weeks perfecting his proprietary methodology, until I showed him other boutiques in his space were winning deals with basic efficiency audits.

The irony here is painful to watch. In trying to look credible, these consultants end up undermining their own credibility.

I've seen this play out across every industry I work with and I can guarantee you this: The fastest-growing boutique consultancies are the ones who are not afraid to start with basic problems. They pick something concrete, something they can clearly solve, and they nail it. The paradox is that choosing a "lower-status" pilot actually creates a faster path to the to the fancy strategic work many of them seek.

‍

The Expertise Trap

Sometimes the biggest thing stopping consultants from picking the right pilot is actually their expertise. Think about it - when you've spent years mastering something, you start seeing how everything connects to everything else. What looks like a simple workflow problem to everyone else? You see it for what it really is: a tangled web of organizational politics, technical dependencies, and change management challenges. And while this deep understanding is valuable, it can actually freeze you in place when you're trying to choose where to start.

There's this thing psychologists call "the curse of knowledge" - once you really know something, you can't remember what it was like not knowing it. I see this all the time with experienced consultants. They can immediately spot dozens of possible solutions to any problem, all with their own advantages. They can explain exactly how everything fits together and sketch out these sophisticated approaches. Sounds great, right? But it actually makes it harder to pick just one thing to focus on. They end up paralyzed by all the possibilities.

The counterintuitive solution is to artificially constrain your options. Instead of using everything you know, you have to deliberately narrow your focus to solving one clear problem really well. Yes, you'll have to temporarily ignore all those broader systemic issues and complex solutions you can see. It feels wrong, like you're holding back value. But this constraint actually helps you deliver more value faster. The key is accepting that you must start smaller to grow bigger.

‍

The 3F Test

Here's something that keeps surprising even veteran consultants: the most successful pilots are dead simple to sell and deliver. I know that sounds obvious now that I've said it. But it goes against everything consultants want to do. They keep trying to build these sophisticated, comprehensive solutions. The truth is: Simple pilots don't succeed despite being simple. They succeed because they are simple.

Complex pilots, even when theoretically superior in their approach or potential impact, tend to fail more often - because they need more things to go right. More stakeholders to say yes. More tech involved. More chances for messages to get crossed. What looks like an elegant solution turns into a nightmare when you try to deliver it to a new client who barely knows you.

So how do you cut through all this? I've found there are really just three questions that matter, and turned them into what I call "The 3F Test":

1. (Familiar) What problem have you solved most often? Not what you're best at - what have you actually done over and over? I had this strategy consultant realize she'd done more than 20 customer churn assessments. Each one led to bigger strategy work later.
2. (Fast) What solution can you deliver in under a week? A tech consultant I work with figured out his "Cloud Bill Review" only took two days. Prospects could say yes to that without thinking too hard.
3. (Friendly) What offering would be easiest to explain to a non-expert? If you can't explain it simply, it's probably too complex. One of my HR clients had this fancy "Organizational Development Diagnostic" that nobody understood. But her simple "Leadership Blind Spot Assessment"? That sold itself because everyone got it immediately.

When a pilot passes the 3F Test, it's not just simple - it's strategic. Modern consulting isn't about selling advice, it's about orchestrating outcomes. And orchestrating big changes requires something that fancy frameworks can't buy: trust.

This leads to a practical truth that took me years to discover: the best pilot is the one that lets you start orchestrating wins immediately. Not the perfect offering you'll have ready in three months. Not the comprehensive solution you're still tweaking. The straightforward thing you can deliver right now.

Think of your pilot as the first domino in a chain of changes. When you nail something simple and concrete - like cutting cloud costs or fixing a broken workflow - you're not just solving one problem. You're demonstrating your ability to orchestrate real change. You're showing you can align stakeholders, integrate solutions, and deliver measurable results. This early proof of orchestration ability is what unlocks larger, more complex engagements.

That's why a simple pilot that actually creates change will always beat a sophisticated pilot that's still in your head. The goal isn't to impress with complexity - it's to build trust through orchestrated wins.

‍

Pilots as Proof of Orchestration

Let me tell you something about how modern consulting actually works: clients don't buy deliverables anymore - they buy proof you can orchestrate change. Many boutiques think they need to lead with comprehensive solutions and elaborate frameworks. But that's backwards. You can't prove your orchestration abilities with PowerPoint.

What clients actually buy is evidence that you can move their organization from point A to point B. They want to see you coordinate all the pieces - stakeholder alignment, technology integration, process change, capability building - in a low-risk way before they trust you with bigger transformations. That's why simple pilots are so powerful: they let you demonstrate orchestration in miniature.

Think about what happens in a well-executed pilot: You're not just delivering a isolated solution. You show clients you can:

• Rally stakeholders behind clear outcomes;
• Adapt your expertise to their reality;
• Bridge technical and human elements;
• Build their team's capabilities;
• Create momentum beyond the initial scope.

Simple pilots win because they're perfect proof-of-concept for your orchestration abilities. If you can explain your pilot in one sentence and deliver results in weeks instead of months, you're going to earn trust that leads to larger engagements.

You don't get to orchestrate major transformations by promising transformation. You earn it by orchestrating small changes with extraordinary care.